Improving Students’ Ability to Decision Making and Communicate Effectively Through the use of Hybrid Nonlinear Pedagogical Models

Volume 14, Issue 1 (2024)

Improving Students’ Ability to Decision Making and Communicate Effectively Through the use of Hybrid Nonlinear Pedagogical Models
Pasca Tri Kaloka, Dennis Dwi Kurniawan, Putri Prastiwi Wulandari, Hideaki Tanimoto
Apstrakt: 
The objective of this study is to examine and evaluate the influence of hybrid nonlinear educational models on decision-making and communication in the field of physical education. Techniques. The intervention group received instruction in physical education utilizing hybrid pedagogical techniques for a period of 12 weeks. In contrast, the control groups followed the physical education curricula of their schools. Pre-existing scales designed for student usage were utilized for decision-making and communication purposes, both before and during the program. To compare the two groups, we utilized paired sample t-tests, two-way and one-way analyses of variance, and a Pearson correlation analysis. Outcome. The research findings indicate that the intervention group exhibited a significant improvement in decision-making and communication when compared to the control group. The aforementioned conclusions are substantiated by the results of paired sample t-tests and two-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The variance (ANOVA) and one-way ANOVA tests yielded statistically significant results. The F statistic was less than 0.05 (F = 0.000 < 0.05), and the p-value was less than 0.05 (p = 0.000 < 0.05) respectively. Furthermore, the intervention based on nonlinear pedagogy and invasion game learning resulted in an enhancement of decision-making and communication skills. Final remarks. Incorporating hybrid nonlinear pedagogical models into physical education instruction with invasion games might enhance students’ communication skills and decision-making abilities. The findings of this study offer encouragement for physical education instructors to adopt teaching methodologies. In addition, research is being carried out to investigate the impacts of nonlinear pedagogy.
Ključne riječi: 
Decision-making, communication, primary school students, nonlinear pedagogy
Puni tekst: 
PDF
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.7251/SSH2401028K
Reference: 
Alawamleh, M., Al-Twait, L. M., & Al-Saht, G. R. (2022). The effect of online learning on communication between instructors and students during Covid-19 pandemic. Asian Education and Development Studies, 11(2), 380–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/AEDS-06-2020-0131 Araújo, D., Hristovski, R., Seifert, L., Carvalho, J., & Davids, K. (2019). Ecological cognition: expert decision-making behaviour in sport. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2017.1349826 Biesieda, V. (2022). Correction system effectiveness of the children physical development of early and younger preschool age with psychomotor disorders (on the example of posture). Health, Sport, Rehabilitation, 8(4), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.34142/HSR.2022.08.04.05 Casey, A., & MacPhail, A. (2018). Adopting a models-based approach to teaching physical education. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 23(3), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2018.1429588 Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Button, C., Shuttleworth, R., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2006). Nonlinear pedagogy: A constraints-led framework for understanding emergence of game play and movement skills. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 10(1). Crotti, M., Rudd, J. R., Roberts, S., Boddy, L. M., Fitton Davies, K., O’Callaghan, L., Utesch, T., & Foweather, L. (2021). Effect of Linear and Nonlinear Pedagogy Physical Education Interventions on Children’s Physical Activity: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial (SAMPLE-PE). Children, 8(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/children8010049 Gaetano, R. (2012). Motor learning and didactics into physical education and sport documents in middle school-first cycle of education in Italy. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 12(2), 157–163. Gard, M., Hickey-Moodey, A., & Enright, E. (2013). Youth culture, physical education and the question of relevance: After 20 years, a reply to Tinning and Fitzclarence. Sport, Education and Society, 18(1), 97–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2012.690341 Green, A. L., Ferrante, S., Boaz, T. L., Kutash, K., & Wheeldon-Reece, B. (2021). Social and emotional learning during early adolescence: Effectiveness of a classroom-based SEL program for middle school students. Psychology in the Schools, 58(6), 1056–1069. https://doi. org/10.1002/pits.22487 Guangxin, L., Dunguo, R., & Qichen, Z. (2022). On the four basic problems of harmonious physical education teaching. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 22(5), 1297–1303. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2022.05162 Harvey, S., Gil-Arias, A., & Claver, F. (2020). Effects of teaching games for understanding on tactical knowledge development in middle school physical education. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 20(3), 1369–1379. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2020.03189 Humphries, C. (2014). Critical Thinking in Physical Education. In Strategies (Vol. 27, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2014.938877 Jaakkola, T., Yli-Piipari, S., Barkoukis, V., & Liukkonen, J. (2017). Relationships among perceived motivational climate, motivational regulations, enjoyment, and PA participation among Finnish physical education students. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(3), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2015.1100209 Kozin, O., Cretu, M., Boychuk, Y., Kozina, Z., Korobeinik, V., & Sirenko, P. (2022). Comparative characteristics of the functional state of future art teachers and other pedagogical specialties students. Health, Sport, Rehabilitation, 8(4), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.34142/ HSR.2022.08.04.02 Lakhno, O. G., Shyyan, O. V., Shyyan, V. M., Solohubova, S. V., & Sherman, O. A. (2020). Use of elements of basketball as a means of psychomotor development of students. Health, Sport, Rehabilitation, 6(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.34142/hsr.2020.06.01.04 Lee, M. C. Y., Chow, J. Y., Button, C., & Tan, C. W. K. (2017). Nonlinear Pedagogy and its role in encouraging twenty-first century competencies through physical education: a Singapore experience. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(4), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 02188791.2017.1386089 Maksymchuk, I., Maksymchuk, B., Frytsiuk, V., Matviichuk, T., Demchenko, I., Babii, I., Tsymbal-Slatvinska, S., Nikitenko, A., Bilan, V., Sitovskyi, A., & Savchuk, I. (2018). Developing pedagogical mastery of future physical education teachers in higher education institutions. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 18(2), 810–815. https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2018.02119 Olson, R., Laidlaw, P., & Steel, K. (2017). ‘No one wants to be taught from a textbook!’: Pre-service health and physical education teachers’ reflections on skill acquisition and a new curriculum. European Physical Education Review, 23(4), 499–516. https://doi. org/10.1177/1356336X16658222 Opstoel, K., Chapelle, L., Prins, F. J., De Meester, A., Haerens, L., van Tartwijk, J., & De Martelaer, K. (2020). Personal and social development in physical education and sports: A review study. European Physical Education Review, 26(4), 797–813. https://doi. org/10.1177/1356336X19882054 Práxedes, A., Del Villar, F., Pizarro, D., & Moreno, A. (2018). The Impact of Nonlinear Pedagogy on Decision-Making and Execution in Youth Soccer Players According to Game Actions. Journal of Human Kinetics, 62(1), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0169 Rekaa, H., Hanisch, H., & Ytterhus, B. (2019). Inclusion in Physical Education: Teacher Attitudes and Student Experiences. A Systematic Review. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 66(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2018.1435852 Renshaw, I., Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., & Hammond, J. (2010). A constraints-led perspective to understanding skill acquisition and game play: A basis for integration of motor learning theory and physical education praxis? Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15(2), 117–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980902791586 Sanderson, J., Weathers, M., Snedaker, K., & Gramlich, K. (2017). I was able to still do my job on the field and keep playing: An investigation of female and male athletes’ experiences with (Not) reporting concussions. Communication and Sport, 5(3), 267–287. https://doi. org/10.1177/2167479515623455 Shaykhislamov, N. (2020). Main Directions and Interactive Methods of Student Speech Growth in Uzbek Language Classes. European Journal of Research, 8(7), 115–120. Silverman, S. (2017). Attitude research in physical education: A review. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 36(3), 303–312. https:// doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2017-0085 Sitepu, A., Cahyadi, A., & Tarigan, H. (2020). Students motivation for admission to study on the educational program “Physical Education and Recreation.” Health, Sport, Rehabilitation, 6(4), 18–26. https://doi.org/10.34142/HSR.2020.06.04.02 Sutapa, P., Prasetyo, Y., Pratama, K. W., Karakauki, M., Mustapha, A., Idrus, S. Z. S., & Sutapa, P. (2020). Motor Development Index (MDI) Based on Combination of Human Development Index (HDI) and Sport Development Index (SDI) as a Success Parameter of Motor Development among Preschool Children: An Observational Study. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1529(3). https://doi. org/10.1088/1742-6596/1529/3/032003 Syahputri, A. M., & Sukoco, P. S. (2020). Application of developmental games based on kinesthetic perception to improve proprioceptive sensitivity, intelligence and cooperation in primary school children. Health, Sport, Rehabilitation, 6(4), 8–17. https://doi.org/10.34142/ hsr.2020.06.04.01 Syrmpas, I., Digelidis, N., Watt, A., & Vicars, M. (2017). Physical education teachers’ experiences and beliefs of production and reproduction teaching approaches. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 184–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.013 Trecroci, A., Invernizzi, P. L., Monacis, D., & Colella, D. (2022). Physical Illiteracy and Obesity Barrier: How Physical Education Can Overpass Potential Adverse Effects? A Narrative Review. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010419 Yi, C. J. (2010). Insights from an emerging theoretical perspective in motor learning for physical education. Sport Science and Studies in Asia: Issues, Reflections and Emergent Solutions, 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814304092_0004 Yi, C. J., Tan, C., Keat, W., Lee, M., Yi, C., & Button, C. (2020). An Investigation of Nonlinear Pedagogy and its Application in Singapore Schools. Research Brief, 14(4), 1–5.