Motor Achievements Differences In Basketball for Junior High School Students

Volume 7, Issue 1 (2017)

Motor Achievements Differences In Basketball for Junior High School Students
Sanjin Džajić, Danijela Kuna
Abstract: 
The aim of this research has been determination of differences in motor achievements in basketball for junior high school students. This research involved 280 participants, male gender, devided in four subsamples each of them 70 participants. Each subsample has represented one grade between 6th-9th grade. Motor  achievements test in basketball have estimated achievements using  five tests, which have required application of  catching and passing, dribbling  and shooting on basket  techniques. For data processing analysis of variance (ANOVA) has been used, while post hoc analysis Bonferroni  method has been used for determining the partial differences between subsamples. Partial differences have been proved in motor achievemnets test  of  catching  and passing in set position, catching and passing in movement, as well as dribbling  in slalom and shooting on basket  in 30 sec , while in shooting on basket from different positions in 60 sec test those differences have not been proved. Using post hoc analysis has been confirmed that in most tests there have been no differences between subsamples of  6th and 7th, as well as between 8th and 9th grade.
There is existance of  deffernces between younger and older tested subsamples due to  higher  level of  motor skills, which has been developed by teaching process and developement of  motor abilities, on the other hand which have been influenced by faster growing and developing  process, that has been especially noticable  in older tested  subsamples. Lack of  significant differences between the results in 6th and 7 th, 8th and 9th  grade indicates necessity of  longer involvment  in teaching process in order  to  have significant  changes in features, among others motor skills and motor abilities, which contribute to  better  results in tested  variables. Better effects of  teaching process can be expected if we analyze implementation plan and program, which includes assessment of presented teaching contains during the classes and which  methodical organisation forms of work have been implemented, as well as evaluation of implemented plan and program  in order to get  feedback  about  success of  implementation.

Keywords: 
motor achievements, basketball, students, junior high school
Full Text: 
PDF
References: 
  • Aruković, Z. (2013). Kanoničke relacije morfoloških odlika, motoričkih sposobnosti i situacionih testova kod košarkaša. [Canonical relations of morphological features, motor abbilities and situational tests of basketball players aged 12-14 years]. Časopis za sport, fizičko vaspitanje i zdravlje„Sport Mont“,vol.37-39/XI, p.580-583.
  • Bajrić, O. & Srdić.V (2015). Prognostički kvaliteti Euro-fit baterije motoričkih testova u odnosu na specifične strukture kretanja  u sportskim igrama. [Predected qualities of  Euro-fit  battery motor`s tests in relation to the specific movement structures in sport`s games]. Sportske nauke i zdravlje br. 5 (1), p. 45-54
  • Burton, A. W. & Miller, D. E. (1998). Movement Skill Assessment. Champaign, IL:Human Kinetics.
  • Coker C. A, (2009). Motor Learning and Control for Practitioners: HH Publishers.
  • Čoh.M., Jovanović-Golubović, D. & Bratić M. (2005). Motor learning in sport. Physical Education and Sport ,Vol. 2, No 1, p. 45 – 59.
  • Fetz, F. & Kornexl, E. (1993). Sportmotorische Tests. Praktische Anleitung zu sportmotorischen Tests in Schule und Verein. Wien: Pädagogischer Verlag.
  • Hadžić, R. (2007). Utjecaj  bazičnih motoričkih sposobnosti i konativnih karakteristika na brzinu vođenja lopte i preciznost u košarci. [Influence of motor abilities and cognitive characteristics on speed of ball dribling and accuracy in basketball]. U zborniku radova III Kongresa i IV Međunarodne naučne konferencije Crnogorske sportske akademije „Sport Mont“,vol. 12-14, (p. 180-185). Podgorica: Crnogorska sportska akademija Podgorica
  • Hadžikadunić M. & Mađarević M.,(2004). Metodika tjelesnog odgoja sa osnovama fiziologije vježbanja.[Method of phyisical education with basic exercising physiology]. Zenica: Pedagoška akademija Zenica
  • Jašarević, I., Jašarević, Z., Biberović, A. & Džibrić, Dž. (2013). Utjecaj morfoloških karakteristika na standardizaciju valorizacionog modela za procjenu motoričkih znanja iz košarke. [The effect of students morphological characteristics on standardization of  evaluated models for assesing basketball motor skills]. U zborniku radova. Međunarodna konferencija sportske nauke i zdravlje, (p. 369-373). Banja Luka: Panevropski univerzitet „APEIRON“ Banja Luka.
  • Jovanović- Golubović.D & Kocić. M. (2004). Utjecaj psihomotorne ravnoteže na preciznost ubacivanja lopte u koš. [Influence of psychomotor balance on precise shooting on basket]. Časopis za sport, fizičko vaspitanje i zdravlje„Sport Mont“ br. 2/II, p. 29-34
  • Karalejić, M., Jakovljević, S. & Janković, N.(2008). Motoričke sposobnosti i košarkaške veštine mladih košarkaša (13-14 godina) i njihova međusobna povezanost.(Abstrakt) [Motor abilities and basketball skills of  young  basketball players (13-14 age old) and their mutal correlation]. U Zborniku apstrakta, „Teoretski, metodološki i metodički aspekti fizičkog vaspitanja“.(p.31). Beograd: Fakultet za sporta i fizičkog vaspitanja Univerziteta u  Beogradu.
  • Kosinac, Z.(2011). Neurološko-fiziološke osnove stvaranja motoričkog programa i motoričkog učenja. [Neurological-physiological bases of creating motor programs and motor learning]. U Zborniku radova 20. Ljetne škole kineziologa republike Hrvatske. (p. 441-446). Poreč: Hrvatski školski sportski savez Zagreb
  • Meinel, K. & Schnabel, G. (2004). Bewegungslehre –Sportmotorik. Abriss einer Theorie des sportlichen Motorik unter paedagogische Aspekt. 10. Durchgesehene und aktualisierte Auflage. Munchen: Sudwest Verlag Munchen.
  • Mikić, B. (2000). Psihomotorika (2.izdanje.) [Psychomotorics]. Tuzla: Univerzitet u Tuzli, Filozofski fakultet.
  • Miletić, Đ. (2013). Motoričko učenje i transfer znanja. [Motor learning and transfer of knowledge].U Zbornik radova 22. Ljetne škole kineziologa republike  Hrvatske.(p. 56-63). Poreč: Hrvatski školski sportski savez Zagreb
  • Mirvić. E. (2006). Relacije između motoričkih i situaciono-motoričkih sposobnosti u košarci.[Correlation of motoric and situation-motoric capabilities in basketball]. U zborniku radova II Kongresa i III Međunarodne naučne konferencije Crnogorske sportske akademije „Sport Mont“.Vol. 10-11, (p. 74-79). Podgorica: Crnogorska sportska akademija Podgorica.
  • Neljak. B. (2013). Kineziološka metodika u osnovnom i srednjem školstvu. [Methodology of kinesiology for junior high school and high school]. Zagreb: Gopal.doo. Zagreb.
  • Pistotnik B. (2003.) Osnove gibanja. Gibalne sposobnosti in osnovna sredstva za njihov razvoj v športni praksi. [Basic of movement; Movement abilities and basic means for their development in sport's practice]. Ljubljana: Univerza v Ljubljani, Fakulteta za šport. Inštitut za šport.
  • Sekulić, D. & Metikoš, D. (2007). Osnove transformacijskih postupaka u kineziologiji. [Basic of transformation procedures in kinesiology]. Split: Sveučilište u Splitu. Fakultet prirodnoslovno-matematičkih znanosti i kineziologije.
  • Tabachnick.B.G. & Fidell. L.S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.